Your question: "Is it weird that I like old music? in 16 and I listen to all kinds of music, but it s usually old, I think music these days sounds all the same and don t really like it. I listen to a lot, artists like Jimi Hendrix, BB King, James Brown, Bob Marley, Status Quo, Dolly Parton, Muddy Waters. And I love blues. Is it weird?"
First of all, they are not or were not artists, they are or were musicians or singers.
Let's see:
weird
adjective
Suggesting something supernatural, fantastic, or bizarre.
su·per·nat·u·ral
adjective
A ttributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature.
fan·tas·tic
adjective
Imaginative or fanciful; remote from reality.
bi·zarre
adjective
Very strange or unusual, especially so as to cause interest or amusement.
Apparently no, it is not weird.
The music you cite is not old. Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, Vivaldi--that is old. There is even older music but it is not quite as interesting, at least not to me. None of it is weird, though.
This is weird music:
"VIDEO: Russia's Putin Sings 'Blueberry Hill' At Charity Dinner"
by Mark Memmot, 13 December 2010, National Public Radio
• http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/12/13/132030597/video-russia-s-putin-sings-blueberry-hill-at-charity-dinner
You can fill in your own words to the tune:
I got my thrills
by invading Ukraine
and buzzing NATO
with my bomber planes.
The evil west
will get its due
as Nikita warned,
"We will bury you!"
... and so on. Be creative.
This is even more weird:
"Caught on open mike, Obama tells Medvedev he needs ‘space’ on missile defense… ‘This is my last election,’ Obama interjects. ‘After my election, I have more flexibility.’ "
by David Nakamura and Debbi Wilgoren, 26 March 2012, Washington Post
• http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-tells-medvedev-solution-on-missile-defense-is-unlikely-before-elections/2012/03/26/gIQASoblbS_story.html
"The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.... several months later... donated $31.3 million to Mr. Clinton’s foundation."
by JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIRE, 23 April 2015, The New York Times
• http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family... As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons..."
by JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIRE, 23 April 2014, The New York Times
• http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0