Question:
A Few Questions About The Harp...?
2009-02-27 13:15:09 UTC
i'm hopefuly going to get a lap or 'lever' harp, 22 string, or 29 string. there are a few things i would like to know.
1) is it simple/easy to learn to play (i'm being self taught, but how hard is it to learn compared to violin, or guitar, or piano.)
2) are they heavy and/or fragile?
3) do they detune easily?
4) how much is a new set of strings?
5)do you need to have long/short nails to play them?


thanks. i want to get either a glenluce 22 string harp with 22 levers or a stony end wee bonny harp with 16. i'm drawn to the glenluce though because of the wider range.
Nine answers:
Doc
2009-03-02 09:55:20 UTC
I play Irish harp myself; mine is a 32-string harp built by an American company called Dusty Strings, which I taught myself to play because there were no other Irish harpers in my city. I didn't find it terribly difficult, because I was (and am) pretty devoted to the music, and I was pretty motivated to play. It is true that lever harp is simpler in technique than piano, violin or guitar, because it is tuned diatonically--the full chromatic range isn't available, and the harp is generally only in one key at a time. And, unlike violin, or uillean pipes, or clarinet, a harp sounds good immediately--you don't have to work up to producing a good sound from it.



Any musical instrument is fragile; as for heavy, a lever harp isn't as heavy as you might think, because the sound chamber is hollow. My harp weighs 23 pounds and stands about four feet tall at its highest point.



As long as the tuning pins are securely in place, a harp won't detune easily unless the temperature or humidity changes, like any instrument. You will get used to tuning each time you move the harp to another environment, such as from your house to your car to some other room; but an electronic tuner will significantly reduce the time you spend. They aren't expensive...be sure you get one!



Harp string sets are made for the individual harp, because of the great variations in size and materials for each maker. Contact the harpmaker you choose for pricing on string sets, or for individual strings.



As for nails--the standard teaching for lever harp is that you keep your nails short. Strings are played with the pad of your finger, the top corner of the fingertip; hand position is a bit like holding a glass of water, with the thumbs pointed up. Pinky fingers aren't used; they are too short and weak. That being said, after playing for 17 years, I recently decided that I want to play a wire-strung harp, which is played entirely with long nails, so I grew out the nails on my right hand, and am delighted with the sound; ornaments sound crisper and more precise, and I have just that little bit more reach. But as you are a beginning harper, I'd advise you to start with short nails for now.



I looked at the Hobgoblin website (I gather that you're in the U.K.); and the immediate red flag that I see is that the Glenluce harp is Pakistani-made rosewood. I'd advise avoiding that one; many Pakistani-made harps are of poor quality, cheaply made and cheaply priced, but not very durable, and they don't make a good sound. Many experienced harpers recoil in horror at the mention of the Pakistani rosewood harps. The Hobgoblin models look to be a bit nicer than many I've seen, but please be cautious--a poor instrument will never produce a good sound, and will limit your progress.



I'm a little more familiar with Stoney End harps, as they are made here in the U.S., although I've never personally played one, so I really can't vouch for them.



If you'd like, you are welcome to drop me an e-mail; you can reach me through my Profile page.
harpdiva1
2009-02-28 15:21:36 UTC
I think you will quickly out-grow such a small harp. I have taught a quite a few people and if you stick with it long enough to really be able to play, you will need 36 strings. The other thing about the Stoney End little harp is that the string spacing is quite tight. Your hands get used to how far to reach for chords and intervals and you might as well learn from the beginning on a harp with a more traditional, wider spacing. If you play piano and guitar you can easily learn celtic harp but you will be much more successful if you go to a teacher for a while to learn how to use your hands properly. Sylvia Woods book and video "Teach Yourself to play Folk Harp" is the classic most people use to get started. You can get it on-line from harpcenter.com - a great source for harp stuff. Any time you spend learning to play the harp will be well worth it. It's a wonderful instrument. You will love it! Good luck!

Harpdiva1
qebm
2009-02-28 02:26:16 UTC
1) For a total beginner, it's "hard"; but since you already play both piano AND other stringed instruments, you have basic skills already achieved: I'm not saying it will be "easy", but not so hard.



2 and 4) It depends on the manufacturer and model.



3) See 2-4; also, harps are a bit more sensitive to temperature and humidity shifts than guitars etc, (more strings, and different structure), expecially with new strings.



5) If you are going to learn the most common technique, you'll need to keep your nails shorts, or shape them so you can pluck the strings with the flesh of your fingertips if you need nails for other instrumens; it is possible to play by plucking the strings with the fingernails (some effects are achieved this way) but it won't give you the same "freedom", unless you're trained on purpose: many "traditional" harps are played with the fingernails (metal-strung irish, and I guess south-american).
Archer87
2009-02-27 13:25:17 UTC
it is hard to learn to play, more like piano. They are heavy- never seen one dropped though so not sure on fragile. They detune as easily as other string instruments as far as I know.



Not sure on string price.



Not long nails because of the way you need to pluck the strings- however they can be a bit past the skin I believe.
2016-02-29 04:31:44 UTC
HARP is for a primary residence only. So no. They will still owe $250K. The interest rate is what gets lowered, not the principal.
Celestyna
2016-02-08 08:15:22 UTC
questions harp
Singlaid
2017-03-01 15:08:11 UTC
short neat nails are nice and also neat. I dont like long nails because dirt can get under all of them and it look nasty

its digusting and gross when somebodys nails are usually all chewed up to the finish.
farrill
2017-02-24 13:10:25 UTC
Wee Bonnie Harp
2017-01-26 23:38:36 UTC
Small is a lot better! Long nails are called "ghetto claws" for a reason. They make a person look like no-class trash.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...