Question:
Do the young people of today realize they are being sold a " bill of goods" by the music industry?
anonymous
2006-09-11 08:47:11 UTC
It isn't necessary for people to accept the poor quality of music (?) being produced today. In the last ten years, the quality of top 40 music, rock and roll, whatever genre you want to call it, has steadily deteriorated. I want to be able to listen to good music on the radio again, don't you? I know you people have strong feelings about this, so let me know how you feel. And, please, let's have decent, intelligent responses to this.
69 answers:
Jenn
2006-09-12 10:35:20 UTC
I agree that music today is tasteless. I hardly even listen to the radio anymore...I just pop in a cd instead. And the subjects we sing about are less than amusing also. Sex, body parts, drugs, cars, money....superficial stuff.

Good music is hard to come by, but you know what? All the crappy musicians out there make the great ones look and sound even better. If everyone was a great musician, they'd get lost in the crowd. Bad music makes good music sound even better.
Yentl
2006-09-12 09:07:10 UTC
Well i realize it, anyway, that its just a marketing campaign for profits, no longer a venue for artistic outlet and display.

Yes, I want good music on the radio too, but, I also dont want the airwaves to predict m y tastes and limit what i discover.

So in a way, i dont mind fishing for and browsing music independently-

the sky is the limit (or the net is rather). Live365.com and other homemade radio stations present to me things I never would find on a radio station here, even if they did play 'better quality music'. I can listen to radio stations from all around the world, homemade or city-based, and I am very very pleased with this.

Perhaps were the radio good enough, I would not have been exposed to all of this? (Well I kind of doubt it since I am diverse anyway)

There will still always be the 'accepted and popular' stuff to play, and everything else will not get airtime.

So the crud on the radio is a BIG JOKE, but it hasn't harmed my access to quality music, so I dont mind. I never listen to the radio, except when i am forced to for 2-3 days at work. And its the same songs, over and over, everyday, several times a day, and they're not even good music imo.

Music has been 'franchized' and standardized like everything else. True artists dont have a place there anymore.

Perhaps this will lead to a split, where 'the market' belongs on the ariwaves and 'the artists' make their own cyberniche?



I feel sorry for the kids who believe this stuff is good music. And I feel sorry for those who think that being an artist or being able to sing means whining and huffing in to the microphone like your publicity coach told you to, not like how you actually feel. They are not in touch with themselves or potential, and are being lead astray for exploitation (both the singer and consumer). :/



But a counterargument is that indeed, the music industry has ALWAYS been this way. Music from certain eras all sound the same (the known stuff, anyway). There were millions more artists than those who recieved airplay. Did we ever find out about them? Probably not.... all the shoo-whop songs sound the same, all the indie-rock sounds the same, all the disco sounds the same..... yes, fads occur but still, airplay was restricted more or less to those fads then, as well. So it's like the current fad is composed of talentless sub-produced "music".



I dunno!!!!! :)) MANY sides to this !!!!! *sheesh!!!*
anonymous
2006-09-11 21:00:53 UTC
Oh to be young again and have all the answers to everything. It would be so simple if the teens were running the world. Oops, I do believe they are after all. I started listening to music in the days of the big bands such as benny Goodman, Sammy Kay, Glen Miller and many others. Stars like Frank Sanatra, Rosemary Cluney, Red foley, Peggy Lee and many more. I still like the music from that time. Then came along people like Elvis, Ricky, Jerry Lee and again a huge hoast of others. Soon it was the betles and the roling Stones and even the Doors. So many names over the time. I will admit I do not like most of the music popularized since about 1955. I do know that the music we listened to and was performed long before I was born was controled by the industry and to a great extent still is. Rember the days of payola? ASCAP had nearly total controle during the thirtys and up till in the sixtys. So you see there really isn't much new in that respect. What really bothers me is how people fall for what they are told is good music. The sex pistols is one good example of how things can be shoved down out throats and we like it. Pyunk was started with the Sex pistols by a guy getting a group of teens together that could not play any instrument or even hold a tune very well. He taught them a few chords and created that noisy punk sound. The name punk came from a magazine named punk that was aleady being published and it published articles about the sex pistols and their music became punk. I culd go on and on about all the changes and how each generation can't understand the one coming after it. Even Frank Senatra was touted for being very much too sexy on stage in his early days. Churches tried to stop his music then. Things change and if it is for the better or not it still changes and always will. It looks like to me that now the internet is here it will be a big factor in what we listen to. Any one can make a CD and publish it on the net and have many lidten to it. If they like it they tell others and then they want more so off to being a star without going through the normal channels. It is already being done.
sahajrob
2006-09-11 20:21:25 UTC
its really nothing new



if you are realistic about it the music industry has always peddled crap but there has been music you liked along with it.



Does the music industry dictate what you will listen to or do they know exactly what their target market will buy. As i get older i believe its the latter without a doubt.



and i dont agree with you that music 'has steadily deteriorated" in the last 10 years



styles come in and out of fashion including musical ones and perhaps the styles you like are just curretly out of fashion.



I can think of a few newcomers in the last ten years who are very talented, clever, and not overproduced



As far as the radio goes, 20 years ago and more most of the better new music was not allowed to be played on the radio. now some words are bleeped but before they would not be played at all
Rebekah
2006-09-11 11:48:02 UTC
The poor quality music of today really isn't any different than the poor quality music of any generation. There has been fluff music and "ear candy" for as long as music has been mass produced. Most of "pop music" is forgotten in a few years, and the music that was more original stands out more, and is played more on the radio. When was the last time you heard most boy band or fluff music from the 60s and 70's, or even the 80's and 90's? Yes, there is some that is still played, but it seems that most fades away.



The unique music that stands out and is of great quality will always stand the test of time. It just isn't apparent until after the generation is over.
Maggie
2006-09-11 18:22:58 UTC
That's very, very true. The music industry of today are not accepting anything different than they've already done. There are many people out there who have original ideas, but the big boys of the music industry aren't in it for originality, just money.



The world is slowly going from the horrible pop phase, to an EVEN WORSE total emo music phase.



In the world of suburban America, if you don't like what's supposedly "in", then you don't belong in social activities and groups.



I would be fine if at least some radio stations played a VARIETY of music. Normally, all it is is the top 20, a long talk show, and then the top 20 again.



Basically, the world needs to make more room for different types of music.
Just Ducky
2006-09-11 16:20:29 UTC
I think it's because the music industry is just getting older. Our technology isn't all so old really, and in the beginning stages of radio, not very long ago, the door was opened for the public to hear music at any time they chose. Consequently, lots of musicians jumped into the industry, due to the ability to reach broad audiences and thus make lots of money. Now that the years have passed, and so many, many kinds of music and tunes have been created, the industry has really evolved. How much more difficult it is today to come up with fresh ideas, as compared to the past when music was in it's infancy. Same way with movies. How many new stories and new tunes can be "invented" without it resembling something from the past. I think it's terribly difficult these days.
L Jeezy
2006-09-11 15:06:40 UTC
Well, music is only a by-product of life. It's true that the meaning of music has deteriorated, and everyone here has given great answers.



If you think about it, music is another way to tell stories. So, if music has deteriorated, so has the meaning of life in today's society. Listen to Lenny Williams, Earth Wind & Fire, Aretha Franklin, Queen, Led Zeppelin or Madonna. Then listen to Pussycat Dolls, Dem Franchise Boys, Gwen Stefani, Chris Brown, or anyone new hitting the scene. You can tell the difference.



The point I'm making is: Chivalry, love and respect were combined into the fuel that kept the true meaning of life at its prime. Now you have "Gimme That, Lean Wit It, Rock Wit It, Loosen Up My Buttons" and all that other crap. Now don't get me wrong, they are doing their thing, but the meaning of life and love has taken a downfall that trickled down to music. If society had not painted such an enticing picture of sex, drugs, riding on 24s, infidelity, big butts and money, then you wouldn't hear it being sung as much as you hear it now.



And people wonder why chivalry is dead.
Vince M
2006-09-12 14:16:24 UTC
The people are being sold the music they want to buy. If by

"bill of goods" you mean the hype associated with marketing the music, then not much has changed since the 1940s and, perhaps, sooner.



Who says it's "necessary" to accept what one doesn't want to hear?



I have no trouble finding what I consider "good music." I hope you are not surprised to read that my parents made the same statements about my music as you are about current tunes. We use to call people like that "old fogies."



Are you one?



By the way, my music was produced in the late 50's and early 60's. Once in a while, I hear a new piece that sounds great to my ears.
techyphilosopher2
2006-09-11 14:50:18 UTC
Sure, it's been that way for decades. Now, I think there's quite a few solutions that can be taken seperately or together to bypass the "music industry."



1) Who says you have to only listen to "top 40 music, rock and roll," whether it's on the radio or on a CD or on an iPod? I bought several CDs from a guy selling his music at the local Farmers' Market - a nice blend of jazz and traditional Spanish guitar. And I wouldn't have even know about this guy without hearing him at a public forum. Surely there must be independant musicians putting out original work in your area, and seling their music at local markets, shows, bars, and on the WWW.



2) Is there an NPR station in you area? Such stations typically broadcast music other than "top 40 music, rock and roll, whatever..." put out by the more mass market stations. Take a listen, you might like hearing other genres. (see #1)



3) Is there a nearby college station with student DJs? often they broadcast stuff put out by small unkown bands, local and national (see #1 and #2)



4) Quite a few station put their programming on the WWW. If you have broadband, try doing a search for stations nationwide that offer soething other than the usual mass-market top-40 satellite downfeeds.



5) There's satellite radio, but I've found that mostly offers mostly mass market top 40 stuff anyway. Not worth the money, but that's just IMHO of course.



6) There's various WWW sites that offer public domain mp3 files from various artists that want the exposures. See my list below. It's worth a listen anyway, as an alternative to top-40.
anonymous
2006-09-12 10:37:21 UTC
I didn't believe this when I was young, but an adult to me at the time told me some 90% of packaged music was hyped up to sell. That is, publicity and/or advertising. And it's true. The Beatles were carefully orchestrated with media blitz, concerts, TV appearances and had a whole vault of European recordings before they came to America. Later, MTV became all too transparent. If the group had a music vid, they had record sales. The recording industry moved into rap and hiphop only because disc sales went down.



Pop music is memories. I didn't believe that at the time when my college professor told me at the time. But it's true. There are no Mozarts or Beethovens in pop music, there are no innovations.



Rap and hiphop will fade off the radar scope one day. Let's hope America is the country that leads the way to something better.
Kingdom_Queen
2006-09-12 08:18:23 UTC
I must say that I love all types of music. Music is wonderful! I love bands or artist that can come up with original sounds, like Metallica, Eminem, BlackEYEpeas, Shakira. These are examples of very unique sounds that separate artists from the musician. But the music isn't the problem, it's the lyrics. That's why I listen to alternative christian rock. Great music, positive message. Music should be music, not noise. The main note that the music industry is playing today is $$$"Ching!Ching!"$$$ and that's why it sounds bad. Music is an art but so many have made it about the money. How sad is that!
anonymous
2006-09-11 13:48:36 UTC
Turn off the Pop stations. You say it is getting worse yet this is what people seem to want. Listen to American Idol, unless like me you know it is fixed, and you see that is exactly what the people are saying they want. As to saying it is going downhill I listen to things like oldies and ask why people liked that in general. Sure there was some good music but in general I don't get what the big deal was. Espically don't get what was so great about the whole psychedelic. A bunch of people on drugs that released music that you can pretty much only understand if you are on drugs really isn't that great. Sure the music is good but the songs are crap. So basically I don't think that the quality is so much terriable but that people want music you consider terriable. Your thought that people are buying it just because it is being put out isn't thinking the correct way. Some people LIKE it and are buying it and it is selling so more is put out. Same thing as why grunge sold for a little while.
anonymous
2006-09-17 00:19:04 UTC
Seems that every generation dislikes the music of the generation that follows. Is today's music really worse than what we listened to or is it just that we grew up with something different and refuse to accept today's music the same way our parents refused to accept ours? I think it's a bit of both but the music industry, as all industries, will always try to find the way to make the most money on the least effort so expect music to continue to decline.
Al CaPWN
2006-09-11 21:27:12 UTC
Speaking as one of they young people, I have in fact realized that mainstream music quality has deteriorated. In fact, it has come to a point where the ONLY radio station I listen to is a classic rock one. The stations that play the modern songs pump through a playlist about 30 songs deep with a rare hit from a few years back here and there. But, if you reach out and do your research, you will find that, looking in the right places, it is still possible to find talented, unique, fresh acts.
?
2006-09-11 20:46:10 UTC
Young people are totally being sold a "bill of goods" and that's not a very healthy one either. So they are not sitting in a church - it's every bit as much preaching as listening to a pastor but a much different message. Some of the messages are sick to the core. Take some of the Rape Rap - where they have women being raped featured as something a man can do. Now this is really going into the pit. Young people just pump this stuff in their ears - sing it out and think nothing of it until they are smack dab in the middle of a relationship where sex comes into the picture and they have no moral grounds upon which to say no. If you want it, it makes you happy - go for it right? Music is like a highway to the soul there is no message to tell young people to think for themselves - garbage in = garbage out - whether it's food or music or drink. I would love to be able to listen to good music on a secular radio station so I guess I have to settle for some of the oldies - young people today probably have no clue as to what "big band" means or that it can be enjoyable and fun even without words. People in the days of Elvis thought - he was really on edge. These days we'd call him a puritan. Yes, it's gone much too far when they cross the lines into rape music and occult nonsense. Young people don't even think twice about dressing like their "stars" when it's obvious to a thinking adult that these music idols are making drooling sex objects out of women and how completely male chavinistic it is how the guys are always covered up and the ladies expecting to bare it all. When Janet was up on stage - you didn't see her partner have a "wardrobe malfunction" with his pants. Not that I want to see that but come on - it's totally putting women down and women and especially young ladies just buy into it everyday with these skimpy outfits and becoming anorexic thinking they are never beautiful enough while no modern musical artists are teaching them to think any other way or even that there is the possibility to think about themselves in a more positive light than this. It's very sad indeed. Janet was really an advertisement for nipple rings - like that's really getting young teen girls to think about some high goals in life!
wanninonni
2006-09-11 16:50:18 UTC
You hit the nail right on the head mountainman. The 'pop' music of today certainly leaves alot to be desired. With out prefabricated, exploited, manipulated 'pop stars', the soul of the music is gone. Evidenced by this is the rapid rate at which the 'classic' rock and roll tunes are being 'redone' with rap versions or rock versions. It's a sad world.



I often tell my kids they won't be hearing any of today's 'stars' being played on an oldie station in 20 years, but they still be hearing the old school music from Motown, Beatles, Stones, etc. The music industry, just like everyone else, is only concerned over the almight $$$$. Oh blah de oh bla da, life goes on....
anonymous
2006-09-11 15:34:28 UTC
I'm with all of you. I think music has went downhill also, but there are a few good bands out there. I do like the new alternative music such as AFI, Breaking Benjamin, I even like the new Pearl Jam. But as far as MTV and listening to the radio, what a joke. Seems like the so called "Pop" music has taken over. It seems to me that most music today reminds me now of what NKOTB use to be when I was a teenager(as far as the POP music).



Has anyone been watching the Rock Star show with Tommy Lee. Not too crazy about this season because I dont like him. I watched last years with INXS and loved it. What's everyones take on that?
?
2006-09-12 14:13:17 UTC
So many answers!!!!

I've hated mainstream radio music since the '80s. Now, Austin Texas ((the Live Music Capitol of the World ((yeah yeah yeah)) ) has one by one removed all the good stations there were, Classic Rock is now the Contemporary Christian station, the Oldies channel is now mix, and forget about blues or jazz. Satellite is the only alternative, and their programming isn't so great either.

I have three bins full of vinyl records, CDs, and 100s of cassettes of Blues Before Sunrise, a radio show out of Chicago.
Stiletto ♥
2006-09-12 11:03:18 UTC
Absolutely-i am from the south and love old country music. Now days the people they choose 2 record albums are chosen based on an image and not talent! Some of the best music I have heard has been on the streets of New Orleans but do you think they would ever get a contract? NO way they don't fit the bill!
coorissee
2006-09-12 01:06:02 UTC
Sadly, you're right.

CDs, *I* believe don't have the same quality as the vinyl. When you run a cleaned-off album on a good turn-table, you CAN tell the difference...

Personally I think the quality of the music got destroyed in the quest to find the right equipment to play all that god-awful bass somebody thought everyone just had to hear. Not only does it shake my glassware in my cabinets and knock my pictures off the walls, but it also tears up a weak car's frame and your gut.

Why was that invented again? Whatever happened to music you could actually hear and enjoy?

Speaking of which, my son had argued with me that all the music that was out when I was his age sounded all the same. He was surprised when I agreed with him,"'Cos that's all they had back then; of course it's gonna all sound the same!"
Shelley L
2006-09-11 11:39:40 UTC
I'm SO with you! Today's music, especially the stuff marketed to the 13-25 year olds, is awful, soulless crap! Today's pop makes me think Madonna was genius. Even the singers with a voice, like Christina Aguilera and Alicia Keys, are SO grossly over-produced that all the spirit is stripped out of them. As far as what passes for rock? Please...kids... AFI, Panic at the Disco, etc. are NOT punk rock!!!! The occasional gems reach the radio and remind me that there is still a market for good stuff (Gnarls Barkley, The Raconteurs, Wolfmother). Most of the timee, though, you just have to be willing to step outside the box and try new stuff and not rely on the radio and MTV (what a joke MTV is now, huh?) Most people are too lazy, though. I guess they can settle for junk. Not me, though. I love to hear new, cool, interesting stuff and I don't have to hear it on the radio first.
curly98
2006-09-12 08:58:53 UTC
Young people accept the music because it is all they have. We on the other hand have had the experience of listening to great music.(depending on age) I grew up in the 80's and early 90's and thought there was great music then, but my parents had exposed me to music that wasn't in my time and I learned to love all sorts of music. The music today reflects the current generation of kids who are getting dumber and dumber. It's good to know that I'm not the only one who has noticed the music of today.
latina03
2006-09-12 00:15:48 UTC
I grew up with this music so I dont think there is anything wrong with today's music. I dont understand why everyone is knocking this music. I think that just because you didnt grow up with this music you dont like it. I think that if you ask any of the kids you will find that they actually like this music. The music right now isnt made to upset anyone it's for my generation to enjoy just like all the other generations enjoyed their music. No matter generation you are from the next generation isn't going to like the previous generations with the exceptions of some songs.
anonymous
2006-09-11 11:27:17 UTC
I mean that is really your opinion. I'm sure when you were young, many adults thought The Doors, The Who, The Beatles, Led Zepplin or whatever was appalling and not good music. And your just looking at the mainstream artists, and even then, some of them can have good music. Coldplay, Alicia Keys, The Roots, AFI, Foo Fighters - there are many good artists today that write their own music, and have depth in their lyrics. I think you have taken a way too cursory opinion of things. And with SO MANY people involved in the industry today than in past years (think American Idol), it's easy to get muddled up in the regular fluff, people have to seek out music that they like. Plus, this music is not marketed to you, as you said, it's being sold. This generation is growing up in it's own context, and not that of the 70s or 80s, things change.
Bob
2006-09-11 08:55:18 UTC
Seems that every generation dislikes the music of the generation that follows. Is today's music really worse than what we listened to or is it just that we grew up with something different and refuse to accept today's music the same way our parents refused to accept ours? I think it's a bit of both but the music industry, as all industries, will always try to find the way to make the most money on the least effort so expect music to continue to decline.
beezebee25
2006-09-12 08:43:25 UTC
In all honesty, I dont think it is the quality of the music that diminished,its more like as the generations change, the music changes as does the cultures and beliefs. All it takes is for the generation to accept in the music just like the older generations accepted the music of their time.
I <3 You
2006-09-11 17:18:07 UTC
Well, it always depends on your perspective. I suppose today you couldn't find any music on the radio that you liked, but for the "young people of today" this is their music it defines them and is extremely popular because it's what they like. I"m sure people in the 1960's said the same thing you are saying about the music today about the Beatles. It just depends.
Stand-up Philosopher
2006-09-11 20:36:41 UTC
What i do is let time filter out all the crap. if the band's CD is still in stores, i might pick it up. usually i wait 10 years after something is released to get it. by that time all the crap songs have been buried.



time is the best filter. if a song has any redeeming value at all it will hang around as part of a "as seen on TV" mix album or something. the songs that are crap, like the macarena, vanilla ice, or the new kids on the block will fade into obscurity and nobody will listen to them or remember them.
New mommy 2010!
2006-09-11 20:35:56 UTC
Well, I don't care for this rap crap they've got now, or most country songs for that matter, but there is a lot of music out there I love. I'm satisfied with the music of today, but I also don't mind listening to the music of yesterday. I guess you need to be more flexible. :) You may like some of the music we have. :)
anonymous
2006-09-12 07:43:07 UTC
what they are doing basicly is distroying the good and great history of music to being something that not every one can hear any more for more than 1 reason: lyrics bad for the kids or music bad for the ear

am with you on this and i wish that not every one has a good or thinks has a good voice or taste sings

theres suppoz to be schools and rules for those who come out every day



when i first saw your Q i thought that you ment that videos are using little kids in videos in a non proper way but both ways am with that opinion
dream girl
2006-09-11 09:07:20 UTC
I agree, but why? It seems that we are on a downward spiral. Think about it, for 500 + years or so the biggest change was uuuhhh the wheel! In the last 150 years we have become unrecognizable even to ourselves. Music is but one thing that proves we have no where to go now but down, what'll be next?
ditzychik508
2006-09-11 18:21:28 UTC
I agree. I say it every time I turn the radio on. Now a days they only sign people if they have a "hot" body and can "dance". No one sounds good anymore, and those that can still sing aren't getting any where.

It's sad because music is my life, it calms me when I'm mad; cheers me when I'm sad; etc... But now all it does is anger me, and the videos aren't much better either.
lorna l
2006-09-11 16:07:08 UTC
I feel that the youth of today are been handed alot form the music world of today there is so many to choose from and some is just plan trash mouth garbage how do we keep the garbage out of music so our young can enjoy it like we do
chris42050
2006-09-11 13:34:45 UTC
The main reason for the music you hear being crappy on the radio is "pay for play". Radio stations get paid to play specific songs a specific number of times a day by record companies. Thats why you hear the same songs all the time. Stop "Pay for Play"!
Joshua J
2006-09-11 13:10:56 UTC
I've quit listening to the radio and rely totally on Cd's that are in my collection. I also only listen to christian, gospel and bluegrass these days. Though you're right about the quality of music today.
anonymous
2006-09-12 12:40:17 UTC
every product you buy is a"bill of goods"

we live in a society based on consumerism.



And the music biz (as with any industry) would have to change their product listing if NO ONE was buying it. But alas, people are BUYING the music that is out there now, so it must not be crap to the thousands who spend their money on it.



they make the crap, BECAUSE consumers buy it, no matter how bad their taste is.
Seth C
2006-09-12 05:37:50 UTC
i doubt that most of the younger generation knows about it, since im young and unaware of it. some younger ppl do konw about it, i have a friend who is into the old classic rock. but i like the music of today. in reality, it all depends on the tastes of the listener. some ppl like the music, some ppl dont. you gotta just learn to respect what their tastes are
anonymous
2006-09-12 14:17:05 UTC
Probaly not.



Has music detoriated? Yes! I prefer to listen to oldies and classic rock. Believe it or not. Why? Good music to listen to that you can tell what the lyrics are! You have a good point, mountain man.
anonymous
2006-09-11 15:20:15 UTC
i like 90's rock and classic rock. Some of today's music is good. I like some 80's music too.
anonymous
2006-09-11 14:27:25 UTC
Why do you care what we listen to? With the advent of the internet, you can dig beneath the surface to find music you like. Instead of wasting everyone's time, why don't you search for some music that does appeal to you?
Cjeanmc
2006-09-12 10:28:31 UTC
I totally agree. If the electricity was off these people would have NO talent.



They can only be heard with a microphone touching their lips, and the volume on so loud that no words can be comprehended.



The majority of these people couldn't sing Capella if they tried.
ann.natalie
2006-09-11 14:30:50 UTC
Totally agree with you. When you compare today's music to the earlier days it is awfull now. Most the singers can't even carry a tune and for some reason people like it,can't understand it!!
phoephus
2006-09-11 12:13:27 UTC
With the Internet making it irrelevant, the music industry is going to have a hard time selling anything.
me41987
2006-09-12 00:32:46 UTC
I agree. I'm 19 and there are very few "current" artists that I listen to. Give me the Boss and Billy Joel over P. Diddy and Britney Spears anyday.
I LOVE DYLAN
2006-09-11 18:30:58 UTC
hey, yeah me,

im 13 and the music isnt doing anything xcept 4 selling so awsum cuz its like 1000000 times better than the stuff u probably listened 2 but hey i like sum 80s 2 but i like music 4rm now like way better cuz its just so good 2 know that if ur in a bad mood 2 just b able 2 turn on music and beat something and let all ur anger out through a song.
I think...
2006-09-12 10:57:30 UTC
I like the music on the radio now. Mxpx, Usher, Thousand Foot Krutch - there's nothing wrong with it, is there?
anonymous
2006-09-11 13:17:51 UTC
Amen brother. Preach on! Where has all the music gone? There was a day a while back when all the music died.
groundbrandon
2006-09-11 23:26:47 UTC
It's just the singers only care about popin hits and getting rich before it was all about the music not the bling bling
sdarp1322
2006-09-11 13:47:40 UTC
I agree, it might not be as bad if the radio stations wouldn't over play songs. I hear WAY too much of Rihanna. Diversity people!! She was cool when she first came out, but now I'm tired of her.
Marijuana
2006-09-12 00:24:10 UTC
yup...i agree.....some of the music makes no sense n' let u feel bored.....but some of us may be able to enjoy it......lol.....music nowadays are just like comtemporary arts.....some of them may be your meat but others' poison...lol.....the lyrics are simpler n' expressing the singers' own mood.......which are more difficult to 'feel' it.....but if u're in the same boat , u'll know how to appreciate them......hope this help.....



p/s: try 'nightwish' : sleeping sun.....the lyric is poetic n' the vocal is beautiful....it's the combination of the new n' old style (operatic singing but rock background)
justsomedumbgirl
2006-09-12 20:43:12 UTC
no they dont

and they dont care

they like being spoon fed their crap

and thats fine

that just leaves good shows uncrowded for me

and good cds in stock and cheap too!

i like liking music noone else likes or knows about

i dont look down my nose at what they like

ill even playt what they like if i give them a ride in my car

i dont want people knowing about hte stuff i listen to its like a window into your thoughts
Demetria S
2006-09-12 14:25:39 UTC
yeah the music on the radio pretty much sucks. rap, rock, i dont care its all manufactured junk. i dont know how to give an intelliegent response.
anonymous
2006-09-12 09:17:59 UTC
yeah, i know. i was begining to think i was the only one to notice that. i really hate that our future generation is listening to this ****.i wish the same stuff was on the radio as what i used to listen to on my moms radio...the problem is even if we did shelter our younger ppl. they still end up hearing it anyway. it's truly sad.
anonymous
2006-09-11 20:42:48 UTC
dude, turn off your radio and go listen to some good music. it's all around.
Bruce A
2006-09-11 08:54:30 UTC
Most likely not. I also totally agree with your previous statement.
anonymous
2006-09-11 16:33:39 UTC
yes most music 2 day sux.. thats why i dont buy cd's..... i bought 1 this year ratm
Mr. Lemons
2006-09-11 12:11:34 UTC
What do you mean by "good" music? I can't give any feedback unless you are more specific.
synchronicity915
2006-09-11 14:24:16 UTC
They just follow along like sheep, man.
Rod
2006-09-12 01:42:07 UTC
I don't think that any of us realized we were being sold a lifestle package.
Cookies m
2006-09-11 14:31:08 UTC
Amen my brother they need to stop this right cutie
anonymous
2006-09-11 23:42:26 UTC
These kids today just don't know what they're missing.
anonymous
2006-09-11 14:45:25 UTC
What do you mean by good music ?

just because you don't like it doesn't mean its bad

one man's junk is another man's treasure

and anyway i don't buy any music, i just download them if i don't like i delete
proud mama
2006-09-12 06:22:52 UTC
i dont think they have a clue cause they are so caught up in other things in life ........
cute sam
2006-09-12 09:52:38 UTC
i dont think do they think another thing not so like that
Mark ABC
2006-09-12 09:08:11 UTC
buuurpppp
Becca!!!!
2006-09-11 12:11:47 UTC
what do u mean?? =[

and i don't think so
Jcontrols
2006-09-11 08:52:40 UTC
Probably not!! :-)=
smoke16507
2006-09-11 18:04:52 UTC
This question reminds me of when I was at college back in the 90's. I was a radio DJ on my campus station for 4 years. I loved it; it was my main extra-curricular activity. There was only one problem: some of the music.



Now, I realize that more often then not, college radio often acts as a forum or new artists and bands that haven't yet made it big on a nationwide commercial level, but I had problems adjusting to the overall change in the sound of rock that was sparked by Nirvana and the Seattle music scene at that time.



In February of 1994, I passed the required test and received a radio broadcasting license from the FCC. I was in my second semester of my first year in college by that time, and could hardly wait to start hosting a show.



But as the time got closer and closer to my first air date, I got the feeling that something was wrong.



I had listened to this particular radio station in the past, as my family didn't live very far from the college. But whenever I called in to request a song, they were never able to play it. I couldn't figure out what good a radio station was if it didn't play songs that just about any listener would know (I didn't know about the many and varied music formats there are in radio at the time). I went through middle and high school knowing that something was different about this station: something that set it apart from the other stations in the area, but not knowing how I knew, or why, until I came to college. And that something was:



Alternative rock music.



Please humor me while I take yet another trip into the past. In the 1930's until at least the 1950's, radio was booming with the variety of programming that television supplies for us today. You could find it all on radio: news, comedy, drama, mystery, adventure, what have you. When TV finally made its existence known, many radio programs found a new home there; and radio receiving sets began to fall into disuse since people were now gathering around the TV every night.



Beginning in the 1950's, radio took a new direction: broadcasting recorded music, particularly rock'n'roll, the primary themes of which were excitement, fun, and romance. When the Vietnam conflict escalated in the 1960's and into the '70's, recording artists began using rock and folk music to convey the attitudes of the American people about the war, usually unfavorable. Examples include Joan Baez, Arlo Guthrie, Phil Ochs, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, and Country Joe & the Fish

.

With the advent of electronic music and the emergence of FM radio, the emphasis of songs in the 1980's changed from "How beautifully can you write or perform a song?" to "What types of sounds can you produce?" Synthesizers were becoming common instruments for most groups and artists: Genesis, Bruce Hornsby, Lionel Richie, Steve Winwood, the Cars, and Yello, to name a few.



In the 1990's, with the advent of the genre of rock called alternative, the emphasis shifted to loud sounds and lyrics containing a message that is usually cynical, rebellious, and bombastic in nature. In the tradition of the Vietnam era, alternative (also known as "college rock" or "independent rock") tends to focus most often on the general inequities of life.



Even today, nearly ten years after I graduated, I firmly believe that if I could do it all over again, I would still not be prepared for the impact that Nirvana and the rest of the Seattle grunge scene would have on the music of the 1990's and early 2000's. I heard some alternative bands for the first time (Filter, Nirvana, Tool, Stone Temple Pilots, Cranberries, Pearl Jam, Nine Inch Nails, Blind Melon; there are absolutely too many to name them all here) and took an instant dislike to the sound in general, even though I had favorite songs that were available at the station, which I would put on the air as often as I could. Since the station's program director at the time insisted that all of us DJ's adhere pretty strictly to a typical college radio station format, my options as a first time DJ were rather limited.



In the same semester that I received my license, I worked at the station, not as a weekly DJ but as a substitute DJ, which meant that I was pretty much all over the time clock. I did shows in the morning, afternoon, and evening. I even did at least two shows during the graveyard shift (midnight to 7 A.M). As far as music was concerned, I would play whatever style the show called for, usually alternative; but I would throw in an occasional older song as a kind of covert protest, usually by INXS, Living Colour, Depeche Mode, or Sting. That at least kept my spirits alive over all of the squealing guitar songs, most of which sounded like they belonged on the heavy metal shows which the station played all day Saturday.



The station staff would meet at least twice a month. Whenever I tried to bring up issues of musical value or artistic integrity, I was teased for being a Phil Collins fan (you had to be there to understand that one).



I remember one particular exchange I had with program director; it should be noted here that he was also a student, as was everybody participating with the station, with the exception of one advisor from the faculty. I said something to the effect of, "What about 'If You Don't Love Me?' by Prefab Sprout?"



"It sucks!" he not-so-tactfully replied.



"It is one of the single, most beautiful songs we have in our entire alternative rotation!" I shot back.



It was at that time that I really began to believe that this guy, who shall remain nameless, had absolutely no sense of musical beauty, and neither did a lot of the rest of the staff, except for the students who played urban contemporary (rap, hip-hop, R&B) on weeknights. If I remember right, it was because of incidents like this one that I did not ask for any newly released music for Christmas that year.



(Well, hardly any. I do remember getting a really great album called "Hot House" by Bruce Hornsby, but that's another story.)



After a year or two of this I finally got that Sunday afternoon timeslot I'd been rallying for, where the DJ's had free reign, and hosted a fairly successfull '80's music show for the rest of my college career.



Anyway, when I returned to my dorm room after the meeting, I put "All This Time" by Sting on my stereo. I listened in particular to the notes Sting was singing and the chords that were being used, and a thought struck me. I figured out another problem I was having with alternative.



What did all of the those angst-ridden, Nirvana-like songs that I was having difficulty sitting through for three hours have in common?



What did all of those new music videos----featuring plenty of guitarists, bassists, and drummers, as well as nice shots of Gwen Stefani's tummy, but no piano or keyboard players---that you could watch while you were enjoying a meal in some places on the campus have in common?



The answer is: most of them did not feature anyone playing piano or synthesizer.



The most blatant example of this trend slapped me in the face when I played piano at an open mike night. At the time, my college had a Friday night club for anybody who didn't want to drink. Usually a different band would perform every week. But in April of 1997, I went to the After Hours Club and played and sang about five or six different songs in the span of 45 minutes:



" Against All Odds" by Phil Collins

"In Too Deep" by Genesis

"Your Song" by Elton John

"Private Investigations" by Dire Straits

"Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm" by Crash Test Dummies

"King of Pain" by the Police



I'm fairly certain that everybody knows these singable songs that have been around for quite a few years, right?



Now, with that said, let me explain a little bit about the band that went on stage before me. They were called Scratch 'n' Sniff, and I believe they hail from Pittsburgh. Their music---if you can call it that---sounds nothing whatsoever like mine. Nor were their lyrics understandable either. The songs I'm thinking of were titled---I'm not making this up---"Cindy Screwless" and "Do You Think About Me When You're Sitting On The Toilet?"



The latter I didn't understand at all, but the former….



How shall I put this? The chorus to "Cindy Screwless" was lifted mercilessly from the hit song "Man Eater" by Daryl Hall and John Oates. ("Watch out, boy, she'll chew you up.") Being a Hall & Oates fan, I couldn't stand that. As if to add insult to injury, Scratch 'n' Sniff went from "Cindy Screwless" right into a hellish, hair curling, stomach turning rendition of the theme from Sesame Street.



What are today's musicians coming to?



I would ask myself that question just about every day when I was in college.



You see, I am one of the rare breed of musicians who possesses perfect pitch (also often called "absolute pitch"). What that means in plain English is that I can tell you the letter of any note and where it is on a piano keyboard in relation to Middle C. Now, most people have relative pitch, which is taken to mean that they can sing and carry a tune, but they cannot "pull" notes out of thin air in the same way someone with perfect pitch might. Also, people with relative pitch would probably not be able to tell you where notes are in relation to middle C unless they sat down and memorized the location of every note and key on a piano.



The point is that as a result of the way my brain and ears process information about musical notes, it is fairly safe to say that the music I play, buy, and listen to follows a clear logical path. During the time I was taking piano lessons, my teacher remarked to me during a session, "You certainly have an ear for picking the most beautiful of pieces!"



Well, my ear for picking the most beautiful of pieces does not receive the same kind of feeling or "vibe" when it comes to alternative. And the path that most bands and artists appeared to be taking during the Nirvana years, and many months afterward, seemed to me to be a rather twisted one. I have more respect for urban contemporary artists (or even the techno artists, whose dark, gritty, special effects-slam dunk songs permeate and pulsate their way through some of the darkest action/adventure movies out there today, such as Spawn, Seven, The Matrix, The Replacement Killers, and the Mortal Kombat movies) than I do for those kinds of rock bands. The fact that the number one female vocalist of the mid-1990's turned out to be Alanis Morrisette, who has one of the most annoying singing voices I've ever heard, only adds to my concerns about musical quality.



Perhaps the most disturbing thing about alternative rock, as I see it, was the potential that it had--or maybe even still has--- to uproot the mainstream music industry from within and change the sound of radio for the worst, if indeed it has not already done so. Because of the amount of cynicism and despair in most alternative lyrics, I believe that most young people are losing the ability to appreciate the beauty in every kind of music, not just rock. I hope it doesn't come true, but I once made a prediction that eventually the sound of music radio may deteriorate to the point where there are no longer any radio stations that still play the oldies and love songs that many adults here know. I'm sure you understand what I mean. My girlfriend and I are partial to people like Phil Collins, Peter Cetera (the former lead singer of Chicago), and Sting.



Even before alternative, I took a dislike to heavy metal and almost felt sick when I saw about three-quarters of the kids in school wearing denim jean jackets and long hair in the late 1980's. I felt the same way about metal as I do about alternative now.



So that's my take on the music scene through the years.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...